They Didn’t Want to Call it the ’5 Year Plan’ We have already commented on previous occasions on the EU’s ‘investment plan’ (see: ‘EU Planning to Spend Money it Doesn’t Have’ for details), which is bound to result in the production of countless white elephants across Europe (such as Poland’s ‘ghost airports’). These investments are apt to ‘boost GDP’ in a number of countries, but will very likely leave nothing but proverbial bridges to nowhere behind. It is going to be yet another giant waste of scarce resources.
Apparently the EU has now given its placet to a ‘Four Year Plan’ with the aim of investinf 315 billion, with various EU governments vying for the best place at the trough. It seems they didn’t want to make it a ‘Five Year Plan’ – that would have been too reminiscent of the Soviet GOSPLAN agency, so a four year plan was adopted. However, what they may not have been aware of is that Stalin actually gave orders that the Soviet Union’s five year plans had to be fulfilled in four years:
As Reuters reports on this latest giant boondoggle thought up by the administrative apparatus of the European socialist superstate project:
‘EU finance ministers agreed the details of a 315 billion euro ($338 billion) investment plan on Tuesday to help revive the European economy without piling up more debt, and now aim to get the first projects going by the end of the year. EU lawmakers must now approve the fund.
‘The plan is the answer we need to confront the main handicap of the European economy: the lack of investment,’ said Pierre Moscovici, the EU economics commissioner, adding that investment had fallen by 15 to 20 percent since 2008.
The four-year plan fleshes out a call by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker to back riskier projects from airports to railways and to confront the fall in investment since the financial crisis. Setting up the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) has been sensitive, with EU governments fearful of not having their projects chosen from a list of almost 2,000 projects worth 1.3 trillion euros that countries put forward. Some EU lawmakers are wary of favoritism toward western European countries over poorer, eastern European members.
Another problem has been that the Commission wanted countries to stump up money for the fund, insisting that it would not be included in debt and deficit calculations. That idea flopped because countries had no guarantee that their projects would be chosen.
Instead, countries such as France, Spain and Germany said they would help fund projects in their country via national development banks, and Italy on Tuesday promised to contribute 8 billion euros to the Italian projects chosen, via its national promotional bank.
This post was published at Acting-Man on March 11, 2015.