The lack of integrity among the press is becoming just in your face. The New York Times published an amazing endorsement of Hillary Clinton on Saturday in hope that they can persuade their readers readers to overlook all the scandals of Hillary and make her Present. I would understand not endorsing either, but to ignore the law, the corruption, and common sense, merely reveals that the New York Times cannot be trusted. This is even more astonishing from the standpoint that the New York Times was the paper to break the story on Hillary’s emails on March 2nd, 2015. It was also the New York Times that published ’2008 Crisis Deepened the Ties Between Clintons and Goldman Sachs’ explaining how Hillary came to help rescue their image. It was the New York Times that reported how Hillary kept changing her story on the emails. To simply ignore all of this as if it never happened leave one speechless at the political attempt to manipulate the public. This is what the New York Times actually wrote in their endorsement:
‘In any normal election year, we’d compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year. A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate – our choice, Hillary Clinton – has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway. (We will explain in a subsequent editorial why we believe Mr. Trump to be the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history.)’
This post was published at Armstrong Economics on Sep 26, 2016.
Recent Comments